Corpus of Modern Scottish Writing (CMSW) - www.scottishcorpus.ac.uk/cmsw/ Document : 578 Title: Proposed Peroration for Mr Cullen's Information for The College of Glasgow v. Professor John Anderson Author(s): Anonymous The Defrs have now submitted to your [¿] the grounds of their conduct in the cases complained of: or they have laid open, to use the language of the Pursr, that sustem of tyranny and oppreſsion which they have carried on against him for many years past. Frivolous and groundleſs, they are persuaded, these complaints must now appear to your Lordships; but they have been productive of real evils to the Defenders. They have been made use of as instruments for traducing their characters as men, and for injuring the credit and interests of the society to which they belong. Your Lordships, probably till this time unacquainted with the peculiar art and industry which this pursuer has long practised, may justly be surprised to find, that a mere difference of opinion about conferring degrees, about extracts and statutes of the College, or even that the paſsing a slight censure upon him for conduct unacademical in the highest degree, should have been made the occasion of rebellion among the students, of appeals to the tradesmen and day-labourers in Glasgow and its neighbourhood, of an application to the Throne, and lastly of a proceſs before your Lordships for damages estimated by the Pursuer at no leſs a sum than 6 or 7000 £. But your Lordships wil be still more astonished to learn, that the Pursuer by his aſsiduity, his intrigues and cabals, and by the groundleſs and exaggerated pictures which he drew of his own suffering, and of the persecutions that were carried on against him, obtained such an ascendency over the paſsions of the lower ranks in Glasgow, that during the short time the delusion lasted, the defenders could hardly appear on the streets without meeting with some marks of their displeasure. Your Lordships will also observe that from the manner in which the pursuer managed his attacks, the defenders had mo means of stopping or interrupting the current of abuse that bore down upon them. To enter into a defence of their own conduct before such judges as the mob of Glasgow, or to retaliate upon the aggreſsor and his abettors in their own way by paragraphs, squibs and advertisements in the News-papers, & abusive hand-bills, would have been a mode of defence derogatory to themselves, and would probably have afforded the Pursuer the very gratification he most earnestly desired. They accordingly submitted with patience to the calumnies and reproaches that were vented against them, confining themselves to the duties of their respective offices, in the persuasion that the temporary delusion of the multitude would soon be over, though not without fear that it would not end without some daring act of outrage. Upon one occasion, indeed, when the Trades-house of Glasgow, influenced by the misrepresentations of the Pursuer had made a strange and unwarrantable attack upon the College in a News-paper, the Principal in name of the Defenders protested against them. Upon this occasion too the Ordinary [¿] of the College thought it their duty to interpose, and in a paper, remarkable in the midst of such provocation for its mildneſs and moderation, contradicted some of the strange allegations by which the people had been hood-winked, and which they knew, from what had occurred to them in the exercise of their office to be false and groundleſs. The Principal's Protest occasioned a long and scurrilous invective against the members of the College, about which they have given themselves no concern, though they can now easily trace out its author. The paper written by the Visitors brought up on them the vengeance of the Pursuer in a manner still more unguarded and unqualified, and for his conduct towards them he has been obliged to answer, in another proceſs now depending before your Lordships. The Defenders humbly hope, that after fully considering the Merits of this cause, your Lordships, actuated by the same views with his Majesty and his Ministers, will not only refuse the conclusion of the libel, but will also, by your sentence, discourage such frivolous and imaginary complaints, and secure the defenders from being again exposed to similar injuries to their characters and interests, and prevent the neceſsity of their being obliged hereafter to spend so much of their time and of the Public funds in vexatious lawsuits, and in combating the restleſsneſs and turbulence of the Pursuer.