Craiters: 01 - Introduction
Author(s): Alexander Fenton
Copyright holder(s): Alexander Fenton
The pieces have been written at odd moments over a number of years. The NWS contributions were Christmas break exercises. ‘E Widdie’ was put together one free evening in Altona at the mouth of the River Elbe, when I happened to have a blank notebook in my bag. Eight of them were written at Krieglach in Austria in 1995, in the evenings or by day in the shadow of the pine forests that gave protection from the heat of a fierce sun, in the region of Steiermark that the prolific nineteenth to early twentieth century writer Peter Rosegger has made famous. Rosegger, the son of a woodland farmer, portrayed the everyday life of his 'Waldheimat' in a long series of graphic volumes, and it is easy to feel how the area favours writing. One or two of my pieces were actually written at Annenruhe, one of Rosegger's favourite vantage points overlooking the town of Krieglach, and the place where he got the inspiration for one of his books. The peace of the place undoubtedly allowed full scope to recollection in tranquillity.
I have written in the language of Auchterless as I know it because I find it comfortable to use for the subject matter. It is the language I was brought up to speak, and I make no apology for it. If something is worth writing, it is worth writing in any language. I have, however, developed a form of spelling that reflects as faithfully as possible – without setting up obtrusive mechanisms - the sounds and cadences of the dialect. Some of my previously published pieces were littered with unnecessary apostrophes and have been rewritten so that this whole collection has a consistent form of presentation which may, if anyone wants it, serve as a pattern for future writing in the Northeast dialects.
It is much more easy to read than it looks. It is a matter of reading it, as it were, aloud, and it will come quickly. Because good dictionaries are available, it has not been thought necessary to provide a glossary. Keith Williamson's Note on Language, Spelling and Pronunciation should, however, be read first by those not familiar with the dialect, in order to get a grasp of the conventions used to express its characteristics.
I am writing too in the firm belief that Scotland’s dialects, in spite of the levelling influences that are everywhere, remain extremely rich and are well capable of serving as vehicles of literary expression. The Northeast and the Northern Isles of Scotland have an active and fruitful tradition of using their forms of speech purposefully and creatively, but other areas are not necessarily far behind. I am thinking, for example, of the excellent literary quality of the Lanarkshire dialect material in Robert McLellan's ‘Linmill Stories’. Writing by native dialect speakers with a real insight into the history and environment and place in the world of their own dialect areas is greatly to be encouraged.
A good dialect is something to be proud of. As the 'standard' language becomes ever more stereotyped, through its use in performing media functions of a generalising nature, its creative powers run the risk of being reduced at the same time. Dialectal speech and literature may yet turn out to be a powerful resource from which the standard language can continually refresh itself, rather than being something that the standard language is constantly levelling out and eroding. 'English' is in reality a massive amalgam of innumerable forms of speech, and it should, therefore, have a built-in capacity for self-recreation, though it may be that reminders have to be given from time to time.
I have another reason for writing in the way I do. This is quite simply that I was becoming tired of what may be described as the Lewis Grassic Gibbon tradition. He came from the parish of Auchterless, too. ‘A Scots Quair’ is a masterly composition in terms of language, for though it can be read more or less easily by the English-speaking world in general, nevertheless for those who come from his area, it can be read almost as if it were written in the pure dialect, with all the correct rhythms and cadences. The problem lies not with him, however, but with a number of followers, who have adopted several characteristics of his style and outlook, and have been doing them to death. They are apt, then, to become the canon. So I have wanted to get back to natural, unforced forms of speech, perhaps more like the way William Alexander wrote for his period. I have found them perfectly capable of expressing anything I wanted. They also represent the language as it is a century later than ‘Johnny Gibb of Gushetneuk’, changed certainly but not so much changed, though change is undoubtedly speeding up now.
Some of the pieces go into a good deal of technical detail about passing skills and passing ways of life. When these are gone, the vocabularies that go with them will soon vanish also, though they remain in the pages of the Scottish National Dictionary and its offspring, The Concise Scots Dictionary, The Pocket Scots Dictionary, and The Scots Thesaurus, as well as in other dictionaries of Scots. I have sought, however, not only to use the terminology that goes with, for example, fencing, stack-building and the like, but to recreate the atmosphere that went with such activities, and to think of the skills necessary to pursue them. This may be where the ethnologist in me takes over, but for that also I make no apology.
All twenty items are concerned with living creatures, animals, birds or others, in particular contexts, whether in the Northeast, in the capital city or elsewhere. Implicit throughout, however, is the hand of humanity, and the attitudes of fowk to craiters. The two cannot be separated, and in at least one of the pieces, on a Slovakian village, it is human craiters that play the leading role.
For encouragement in this enterprise, I am greatly indebted to Ian Olson, and to others. Grateful thanks also to Keith Williamson, for taking such a direct and practical degree of interest.
The following items have been published before, though some changes in spelling and content have sometimes been made here:
‘Kippert’. New Writing Scotland (Association for Scottish Literary Studies), Aberdeen 1987, 78-88.
‘Glory Hole’. New Writing Scotland (Association for Scottish Literary Studies), Aberdeen 1989, 44-49; also in James Robertson, ed., ‘A Tongue in Yer Heid’, Edinburgh 1994, 39-46.
‘Stirries’. Aberdeen University Review, No 180 (1988), 314-316; also in ‘Lallans’, 32 (1989), 16-18.
‘E Cheer’. Aberdeen University Review, No 189 (1993) 66-67.
‘E Black Things’. Aberdeen University Review, No 191 (1994), 285-286.
This work is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
The SCOTS Project and the University of Glasgow do not necessarily endorse, support or recommend the views expressed in this document.
Cite this Document
Craiters: 01 - Introduction. 2021. In The Scottish Corpus of Texts & Speech. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Retrieved January 2021, from http://www.scottishcorpus.ac.uk/document/?documentid=525.
"Craiters: 01 - Introduction." The Scottish Corpus of Texts & Speech. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 2021. Web. January 2021. http://www.scottishcorpus.ac.uk/document/?documentid=525.
The Scottish Corpus of Texts & Speech, s.v., "Craiters: 01 - Introduction," accessed January 2021, http://www.scottishcorpus.ac.uk/document/?documentid=525.
If your style guide prefers a single bibliography entry for this resource, we recommend:
The Scottish Corpus of Texts & Speech. 2021. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. http://www.scottishcorpus.ac.uk.