assize
See this word as a collocate cloud
be identified at the 1426 | assize | a new ounce type is |
41 ounces from the 1426 | assize | and then 55 ounces or |
other aspects of the 1426 | assize | appear to show similar changes |
boll defined in the 1426 | assize | but these are the corrupt |
a complex and frequently misunderstood | assize | of 1426 dating from near |
of features of the 1426 | assize | suggest that its form may |
early printings of the 1426 | assize | supplemented by any manuscript copies |
snd 4 although the 1426 | assize | tells us that the pint |
at least before the 1426 | assize | the dost entry for gallon |
size twice at the 1426 | assize | the gallon is doubled in |
metrological definition in the 1426 | assize | the pint and the gallon |
his version of the 1426 | assize | was published in 1814 and |
modified version of the 1426 | assize | which also appears in balfour |
quite explicit in the 1426 | assize | which compares the original with |
trois ounces from the 1587 | assize | where the legislators were merely |
firlot sizes of the 1618 | assize | but only by using the |
it in the final major | assize | in 1618 so entrenched was |
description taken from the 1618 | assize | in addition however stevenson repeats |
though every weights and measures | assize | repeats the liturgy of the |
the first weights and measures | assize | is a text attributed to |
portion of the early david | assize | of weights and measures that |
naming of the unit interpreting | assize | texts the first weights and |
a typical weights and measures | assize | would provide a series of |
from aps the scope of | assize | legislation secondly assize legislation is |
gallon in the undatable david | assize | of wine aps i 676 |
bar of trial of tholed | assize | it would be required to |
a final problem with interpreting | assize | texts is that they provide |
law res judicata or tholed | assize | will arise the fact that |
units a third problem with | assize | definitions is that they describe |
inches these helpful and descriptive | assize | definitions should form a natural |
larger customary allowance revision of | assize | texts these definitions provide much |
scope of assize legislation secondly | assize | legislation is selective in scope |
internal inconsistencies and contradictions in | assize | texts although a fairly full |
for a number of reasons | assize | texts are difficult to use |
some of the features of | assize | texts that provide cautions about |
tongue the problem is that | assize | texts turn out to be |
was sold change in the | assize | units a third problem with |
a definitive text for the | assize | thomson created a version which |
upon his shoulder then the | assize | bent their heads together and |
that in every instance the | assize | shows continuity in the trading |
english court and administration the | assize | is remarkable for two reasons |
parliamentary record of this last | assize | is lost a number of |
than authorised at the last | assize | perhaps forty or fifty years |
oot o his mou tae | assize | him ecclesiastes 3 1 8 |
be presented at the next | assize | when the cycle of enlargement |
mattha we maun thole our | assize | for aa our ill daens |
by this amount at each | assize | to take a greatly simplified |