puk

See this word as a collocate cloud

the executive s stake in	puk	could make a difference by
mcconnell having a stake in	puk	is not necessarily the same
to hold a stake in	puk	so that scotland can have
of having a stake in	puk	there would be a conflict
uk public sector stake in	puk	this is straightforward arithmetic 10
represented having a stake in	puk	will give us the right
to take a stake in	puk	without the clear agreement of
get a good financial deal	puk	hopes to bundle several of
for several projects together could	puk	take a bundle of projects
puk would be employed by	puk	and not by anybody else
under the heading constitution of	puk	the memorandum says that puk
puk the memorandum says that	puk	will be a public company
wrong that the staff of	puk	would be employed by puk
mr mcconnell the purpose of	puk	is not to provide loan
take up an involvement with	puk	mr mcconnell the scottish executive
whether a project goes for	puk	support mr mcconnell mr swinney
the minister do you want	puk	to be successful mr mcconnell
to be successful mr mcconnell	puk	will be successful we want
are tendering for contracts that	puk	will decide on mr mcconnell
mr mcconnell the board of	puk	would determine the strategy allocate
return to the stakeholders in	puk	as the projects develop its
first group of projects that	puk	is supporting the next time
one of the purposes of	puk	is to help projects that
has been added whether the	puk	projects have got to the
any of those projects and	puk	s fees will have to
scottish ppp projects will receive	puk	support will you indicate the
what is important is that	puk	would decide on individual projects
strongly recommending our involvement in	puk	rather than the creation of
force anybody into involvement with	puk	would be wrong mr swinney
staff who are employed by	puk	come from the private sector
anybody else that bid for	puk	support would do so on
keith raffan if you want	puk	to be successful and finance
for the scottish parliament and	puk	mr swinney can i encourage
some of the criteria that	puk	will examine when judging whether
same as the criteria that	puk	will use andrew wilson i
up to the board of	puk	to decide internally as the
you encourage them to approach	puk	or will you encourage them
project to pull back from	puk	support mr raffan it might
it wants to ask for	puk	support andrew wilson to be
schools project is one that	puk	wants to back rather than
project goes on john henderson	puk	will be a plc there
effective the task force and	puk	have presumably been set up
be embarked upon to justify	puk	s support for the development
of that size but with	puk	support there should be some
that could be available from	puk	for scottish public sector bodies
public sector s share in	puk	is it because the executive
the mechanisms that will become	puk	could be expanded upon by
from as a result of	puk	being a uk body far
of a body such as	puk	which is being established with
hope that the advice that	puk	would provide would ensure that
them unsuitable for ppps could	puk	help that difficulty by enabling
brief questions first how will	puk	be benchmarked secondly if we
will now be part of	puk	in a sense the value
to take their bids to	puk	or some other venture will
made about individuals what is	puk	s judgment process and will
those who have shares in	puk	we would get back what
costs have been incurred by	puk	the intention is that those
likely to be lower because	puk	is backed with a minority
vol 7 p 78 in	puk	but the minister is unable
to have a say in	puk	decision making precisely what decisions
with a shareholding interest in	puk	and the place from where
and put that out to	puk	for assistance are you suggesting