recommendation
See this word as a collocate cloud
| begin with document 295 the | recommendation | is that we should await |
| convener for document 317 the | recommendation | is to await the memorandum |
| convener for document 310 the | recommendation | is to await the memorandum |
| scotland for implementing the sutherland | recommendation | and i believe that that |
| we will implement the sutherland | recommendation | for free personal care for |
| necessary to implement sutherland s | recommendation | for universal personal care there |
| altogether this is our key | recommendation | in other words the sutherland |
| the point of the sutherland | recommendation | is that it is the |
| the implementation of the sutherland | recommendation | of free personal care i |
| she was concerned this particular | recommendation | of sutherland s 24 recommendations |
| the implementation of the sutherland | recommendation | on personal care costs i |
| on sir stewart sutherland s | recommendation | on personal care the important |
| be extended whether the sutherland | recommendation | on personal care would be |
| implementing sir stewart sutherland s | recommendation | that all community care funds |
| scottish executive to implement immediately | recommendation | 167 of the mcintosh commission |
| whether it will implement the | recommendation | made by the accounts commission |
| scottish executive to implement the | recommendation | of the royal commission chaired |
| to implement in full the | recommendation | of the royal commission that |
| to implement the committee s | recommendation | that three to five year |
| report concluded that implementing its | recommendation | would by the middle of |
| volume ii ii is that | recommendation | agreed to members indicated agreement |
| 2001 301 final is that | recommendation | agreed to members indicated agreement |
| 01 copen 24 is that | recommendation | agreed to members indicated agreement |
| 3 eurojust 7 is that | recommendation | agreed to members indicated agreement |
| 01 droipen 37 is that | recommendation | agreed to members indicated agreement |
| indicated agreement the convener the | recommendation | for the list of documents |
| indicated agreement the convener the | recommendation | for the list of documents |
| indicated agreement the convener the | recommendation | for the list of documents |
| do we agree to that | recommendation | members indicated agreement the convener |
| its response is to the | recommendation | in the recent report into |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | in the recent report on |
| the parliament welcomes the constructive | recommendation | of the recent reports into |
| and insert welcomes the constructive | recommendation | of the recent reports into |
| the scrutiny of documents a | recommendation | note has been circulated i |
| numbers on the sift scrutiny | recommendation | note i begin with document |
| interest on first scrutiny the | recommendation | note is deferred until we |
| intends to act upon this | recommendation | s1w 9117 christine grahame to |
| intends to act upon this | recommendation | s1w 9238 fiona hyslop to |
| intends to act upon this | recommendation | s1w 9240 fiona hyslop to |
| intends to act upon this | recommendation | s1w 9241 fiona hyslop to |
| intends to act upon this | recommendation | s1w 9242 fiona hyslop to |
| was a matter of personal | recommendation | he had been introduced to |
| on long term care s | recommendation | on free personal care and |
| will he support the key | recommendation | that nursing care and personal |
| recommendations in full particularly the | recommendation | that personal care costs should |
| convener for document 305 the | recommendation | is no further action is |
| report costs implementation of its | recommendation | at 110 million per annum |
| in the implementation of the | recommendation | of the review of sensory |
| implementation of the mcintosh report | recommendation | that councils should be provided |
| is in relation to the | recommendation | made by energy action scotland |
| the paper mrs mcintosh the | recommendation | seems like a good idea |
| the documents for which the | recommendation | is for no further action |
| documents on page 3 the | recommendation | is that the following documents |
| committee whether to accept the | recommendation | do members agree to the |
| did not agree to our | recommendation | for a six month timetable |
| do members agree to the | recommendation | in paragraph 26 3 members |
| we should not make a | recommendation | on the bill or agree |
| however agree with the snh | recommendation | that existing designations should not |
| agree with the report s | recommendation | to refer to the subordinate |
| committee agree to make no | recommendation | to the parliament on them |
| environment committee with a strong | recommendation | from this committee that the |
| should indicate that our strong | recommendation | is that the sga should |
| environment committee with the strong | recommendation | that it take the matter |
| environment committee with the strong | recommendation | that they consider seeking the |
| reports costs as suggested in | recommendation | 27 g of the report |
| specifics of the request my | recommendation | is that petition pe369 should |
| of the scottish parliament the | recommendation | is that the petition should |
| a national concessionary scheme the | recommendation | is that the petition should |
| attached to members papers the | recommendation | is that the petition should |
| link pe431 to pe223 the | recommendation | is that we refer petition |
| do with the petition the | recommendation | refers to an earlier petition |
| land reform policy group s | recommendation | that the scottish law commission |
| sir andrew had written a | recommendation | which the captain of the |
| of equity upon which the | recommendation | is based but that we |
| s report maureen macmillan the | recommendation | is that there needs to |
| europe the report s key | recommendation | is the establishment of a |
| made siccar status the first | recommendation | o its report in june |
| made secure status the first | recommendation | of its report in june |
| executive whether it supports the | recommendation | of the 3rd report 2001 |
| the privy council following the | recommendation | of the robbins report in |
| law the convener is the | recommendation | set out in the report |
| agreed to the report s | recommendation | to write to scottish natural |
| note that it includes a | recommendation | to write to the executive |
| often end with a specific | recommendation | for action e g so |
| 322 323 and 324 the | recommendation | is no further action are |
| deplete the ozone layer the | recommendation | is no further action but |
| 307 308 and 309 the | recommendation | is no further action is |
| 314 315 and 316 the | recommendation | is no further action is |
| makes the decision on the | recommendation | of access to the list |
| the executive s response to | recommendation | 6 the committee said that |
| the executive s response to | recommendation | 8 fails to address the |
| the care development group s | recommendation | for 100 per cent resource |
| legitimate before the convener the | recommendation | refers only to their role |
| des mcnulty is that a | recommendation | the convener i think that |
| unequivocally commit itself to this | recommendation | and come forward with a |
| ones or will a uk | recommendation | be put forward a uk |
| be put forward a uk | recommendation | would not reflect the difference |
| the environment committee with a | recommendation | that it support it and |
| the standards committee with its | recommendation | and such a recommendation may |
| back to committee with that | recommendation | and was again ignored that |
| back to that the second | recommendation | is for the committee to |
| has been lodged so the | recommendation | is that the committee does |
| has been lodged so the | recommendation | is that the committee make |
| has been lodged so the | recommendation | is that the committee make |
| whether it will accept the | recommendation | of the justice 1 committee |
| for taking the committee s | recommendation | on board peter peacock keith |
| that the committee make no | recommendation | on the order is that |
| that the committee make no | recommendation | on the regulations is that |
| committee does not make any | recommendation | on the regulations is that |
| have a paper with a | recommendation | placed before the next committee |
| public petitions committee with the | recommendation | that it be reallocated to |
| and sport committee with the | recommendation | that it be taken into |
| rural development committee with the | recommendation | that it is taken into |
| with the presbytery committee s | recommendation | that the fiddes district church |
| i support the committee s | recommendation | that volunteering is to be |
| take up the committee s | recommendation | to produce best practice guidance |
| by supporting the committee s | recommendation | to support the general principles |
| i raised the question the | recommendation | to the committee said that |
| a committee can present a | recommendation | to the executive that will |
| we should make a firm | recommendation | for the measure to be |
| not wish to make any | recommendation | on the instrument are we |
| determined that it had no | recommendation | to make the food irradiation |
| the ombudsmen could make a | recommendation | to parliament on an issue |
| these instruments to make no | recommendation | to the parliament 7 timetabling |
| it is true that our | recommendation | was that candidates should try |
| speak in support of the | recommendation | that we seek a formal |
| are obviously aware of the | recommendation | that we raise the matter |
| code of conduct following the | recommendation | for such a code in |
| however we made a clear | recommendation | although we understand that the |
| insert 1 where on a | recommendation | having been made to them |
| authority 1a where without a | recommendation | having been so made to |
| to the rejection of the | recommendation | made to the executive by |
| 20 area fishery boards the | recommendation | was made on the basis |
| as the parliament on the | recommendation | of the conveners liaison group |
| the parliament agrees with the | recommendation | of the scottish parliamentary corporate |
| the parliament agrees to the | recommendation | of the scottish parliamentary corporate |
| was not timeous in its | recommendation | to the european parliament that |
| parliament notes with concern the | recommendation | to the loch lomond and |
| its recommendation and such a | recommendation | may propose the removal of |
| turned its back on the | recommendation | of the borders rail feasibility |
| executive is acting on that | recommendation | and will bring together that |
| supporting memorandums that is why | recommendation | has been deferred in some |
| other two papers the third | recommendation | is for us to instruct |
| what is being recommended the | recommendation | is that the priority need |
| the problem why is the | recommendation | not being implemented one explanation |
| is that it makes no | recommendation | on the bill my reason |
| is no delay the charging | recommendation | was always going to be |
| to the ppc with the | recommendation | that it be reallocated to |
| has some doubts about our | recommendation | on shortening the timetable to |
| the first proposal follows the | recommendation | in paragraph 9 to amend |
| s attention to the first | recommendation | on page 17 of the |
| us examine subsection 3 the | recommendation | to inform a former surveillance |
| if so how such a | recommendation | will affect the original intention |
| planning control that goes against | recommendation | 1 of the transport and |
| we have rejected the oft | recommendation | and that we value the |
| term the basis for that | recommendation | appears to be that it |
| it will ensure that the | recommendation | in the scottish intercollegiate guidelines |
| just mentioned an over enthusiastic | recommendation | that a fire master might |
| took him up on his | recommendation | and so after an hour |
| palma on don herreros s | recommendation | he rented the magnificent home |
| and to condone their continued | recommendation | and use in some council |
| as much weight behind the | recommendation | as it can to ensure |
| anyone wishes to change a | recommendation | or has a comment to |
| the idea of accepting a | recommendation | to consider the question in |
| in and give you a | recommendation | mary scanlon yes i hope |
| one point at a time | recommendation | summary and conclusion discussion texts |
Top
