states
See this word as a collocate cloud
of competence of the member | states | 5 what would the consequences |
be left to the member | states | 9 what amendments should be |
professional lobbyists the next paragraph | states | a member should consider whether |
the convener the next paragraph | states | a member should not offer |
for many of the member | states | a wide array of actions |
informed of the other member | states | about the eu s work |
among large and small member | states | about the sort of union |
supporting the action of member | states | adopting measures of encouragement or |
lead the fight in member | states | against any form of discrimination |
year on year the member | states | agree certain priorities for their |
in the presidency conclusions member | states | agreed that investing in people |
working on the strategy member | states | agreed that we could begin |
in the laeken declaration member | states | agreed to set up the |
3 it also entails member | states | agreeing common targets benchmarking peer |
lot of sense although member | states | all have their own approach |
surrounded by the new member | states | all of them independent countries |
such languages within the member | states | although some of these languages |
with the eu its member | states | and acceding states and for |
europeans across the eu member | states | and beyond additionally the website |
sufficiently achieved by the member | states | and can therefore by reason |
links with new eu member | states | and developing countries require quangos |
its member states and acceding | states | and for the executive s |
of individuals in the member | states | and how it reinforces clarifies |
in each of the member | states | and recognises the importance and |
to abolishing extradition between member | states | and replacing it by a |
the people of the member | states | and straight to the centralised |
by all the 15 member | states | and that can only be |
parliaments from all current member | states | and the accession candidate countries |
protection policies in the member | states | and the community to promote |
eu the competence of member | states | and the shared competence of |
essentially the responsibility of member | states | and their national regional and |
more emphatically to the member | states | and where constitutions provide to |
and good practice between member | states | and with the commission to |
conditions that prevail in member | states | any new country will be |
just how powerful small member | states | are in holding up the |
that is partly because member | states | are reluctant to give up |
of europe all eu member | states | are signatories to the nasco |
administrative provisions of the member | states | as directly affect the functioning |
decisions are binding on member | states | as to the results to |
union s traditionally neutral member | states | austria finland sweden and ireland |
in the future should member | states | be accorded full competence or |
the union and its member | states | be made clearer 2 at |
of the eu and member | states | believes that the people of |
by individual european union member | states | but by member states co |
a group of six member | states | but not arguably for 15 |
pooled sovereignty from its member | states | but that each state should |
for naming and shaming member | states | but to identify and compare |
the end of 2004 member | states | can give aid to fishermen |
ways in which individual member | states | can improve their labour market |
justice is clear that member | states | can only take account of |
so and whether other member | states | can stop them because the |
month period during which member | states | cannot progress a measure when |
and the disabled with member | states | choosing amongst those actions according |
member states but by member | states | co operating to address those |
competence concurrent competence and member | states | competence complementary competence is used |
small businesses than other member | states | countries that have on average |
learning notes that individual member | states | decide which languages should be |
learning notes that individual member | states | decide which languages should be |
plans each of the member | states | describe the main policy measures |
and minority languages which member | states | designate as eligible urges the |
community for a while member | states | did not do very much |
ordinating the action of member | states | e g economic policy employment |
national experts from the member | states | each member state appoints two |
promotion of inclusion in member | states | employment education and training health |
27 instead of 15 member | states | enlargement will also strengthen the |
from 15 to 25 member | states | europe s leaders recognised that |
was agreed between the member | states | european leaders have recognised that |
of such treaties all member | states | except britain and denmark agreed |
comes from trade between member | states | external trade makes up only |
the vessels of other member | states | fishing in their waters and |
decisions back to the member | states | for example as fiona hyslop |
competence between eu and member | states | for example by checking if |
union s present 15 member | states | for example rates of unemployment |
across and within the member | states | for example the level of |
the priorities of the member | states | for the next two years |
without preventing the other member | states | from acting the most important |
take in ten new member | states | from central and eastern europe |
will not represent the member | states | from which they come otherwise |
naps inclusion it recommended member | states | give greater attention to the |
of territorial integrity of member | states | great care has been taken |
european council all the member | states | have been able to examine |
rules of the cfp member | states | have increased powers to inspect |
beneficial to its development member | states | have progressed treaty by treaty |
best practice each year member | states | have submitted national action plans |
to ensure that the member | states | have the military capabilities needed |
part of their catch member | states | have to classify their whitefish |
salmon in an sac member | states | have to take action to |
the commercial interests of member | states | however international trade in the |
direction from the eu member | states | i move amendment s1m 3678 |
other eu regions and member | states | i suggest that we ask |
help the union s member | states | identify and anticipate crises that |
social policies and 15 member | states | implementing certain others there was |
european union with 14 member | states | implementing some european social policies |
common outline to assist member | states | in drawing up their plans |
that were reached by member | states | in early 1999 those agreements |
with other regions and member | states | in europe and being part |
european commission by the member | states | in june 2001 in these |
across some of the member | states | in particular those with a |
the goodwill of the member | states | in taking action and setting |
decisions are binding on member | states | in terms of what they |
citizens the relationship between member | states | in the union appendix 2 |
catch of other eu member | states | in their home waters in |
have been adopted by member | states | in their naps inclusion in |
1 the ten new member | states | include cyprus estonia hungary latvia |
of interest to many member | states | including ours the commission is |
with more but smaller member | states | is emerging and that the |
key challenge for the member | states | is to ensure the objective |
the activities of the member | states | it also enables the council |
and regulations of the member | states | it also ensures that measures |
many extraditions to eu member | states | it has approved since may |
across and within the member | states | it identifies eight core challenges |
different position from other member | states | it may be appropriate for |
drawn up within the member | states | january june step 3 naps |
treaties or to harmonise member | states | legislation in fields in which |
level because in many member | states | local authorities share administrative responsibility |
legislation which affords the member | states | more room for manoeuvre in |
and co ordinated approach member | states | must implement the common european |
council based on the member | states | naps inclusion the first joint |
that paragraph the next paragraph | states | no member should use his |
languages exist in the member | states | of europe they have survived |
delegates from the sixteen member | states | of the oslo paris convention |
has had with eu member | states | on these matters and what |
three quarters of the member | states | or all the citizens of |
achieve but they leave member | states | or national authorities to choose |
union eu and the member | states | over the coming decades a |
the collective heads of member | states | parliaments other parties are open |
at the national level member | states | parliaments should have greater powers |
difficulties experienced by certain member | states | particularly denmark but also france |
national systems it encourages member | states | progressively to develop their own |
exclusion which state how member | states | propose to implement the common |
that while other european member | states | provide generous financial support for |
in march 2000 the member | states | recognised that the extent of |
the lisbon european council member | states | recognised that the transformation to |
the waters of other member | states | regional advisory councils racs made |
approach between the eu member | states | regional and local authorities the |
allocating fishing quotas between member | states | retaining the existing access restrictions |
from maastricht when the member | states | revised the treaty on european |
kingdom and b eu member | states | s1w 34834 richard lochhead to |
would be preferred most member | states | share that view the nearest |
and legislative assemblies inside member | states | should not have access to |
europe co ordination of member | states | social inclusion policies is assuming |
the fact that most member | states | still lack a comprehensive policy |
in each of the member | states | supported by michael matheson lord |
body of opinion among member | states | that 20 commissioners is too |
little additional time for member | states | that do not have procedures |
by deaf people in member | states | that is an issue of |
one of the strongest member | states | that is the uk while |
our opposition to the member | states | that practise industrial fishing in |
only four european union member | states | that recognise their native sign |
the eu and its member | states | the convention meeting in june |
naps inclusion of the member | states | the development of 18 common |
must be recognised the member | states | the eu the internal territorial |
the eu and the member | states | the european charter of fundamental |
between the commission the member | states | the social partners and other |
march 2000 set the member | states | the strategic goal of eradicating |
best practice across the member | states | the uk nap inclusion 2001 |
control the big five member | states | their influence will affect personal |
which extends beyond the member | states | themselves we will repeat our |
6 sandeel norway pout member | states | then have to calculate the |
lesser extent by most member | states | these are developing an inclusive |
each of the fifteen member | states | these naps are submitted to |
the eu and the member | states | this distinguished complementary competence from |
is implemented across the member | states | through a new eu level |
increase the number of member | states | through an enlarged european union |
to encourage cooperation between member | states | through initiatives aimed at improving |
is that it takes member | states | time to prepare behind the |
from its present 15 member | states | to 25 will become a |
the eu and its member | states | to be organised i e |
treaty in all the member | states | to begin working on the |
encourage co operation between member | states | to combat social exclusion it |
encourage co operation between member | states | to combat social exclusion online |
then up to individual member | states | to decide on their own |
affect the right of member | states | to define the fundamental principles |
to encourage other eu member | states | to discourage the illegal transportation |
of competencies in different member | states | to encourage dialogue and co |
around the coasts of member | states | to fishing vessels that traditionally |
charter however it expects member | states | to increase the amount of |
that requires european union member | states | to locate and provide details |
resolution that called for member | states | to recognise sign language in |
barcelona european council for member | states | to reduce significantly the number |
and regions other than member | states | today s debate has reminded |
best practice across the member | states | vanderbroucke 2001 the laeken summit |
in other european union member | states | was limited to those in |
of the eu and member | states | we also need a guide |
the differences in the member | states | we are conducting an inquiry |
the european social model member | states | were invited to develop their |
their merit the small member | states | were suspicious of that and |
persons residing in the member | states | whatever their age background social |
coe of the 43 member | states | which comprise the council of |
towards taking in new member | states | while embarking on the reform |
they will amount to member | states | will be asked to translate |
20 august 2001 what member | states | will be attending the meeting |
signed by the incoming united | states | administration we are still in |
in england and the united | states | although changes are beginning to |
being composed in the united | states | and all english speaking countries |
being composed in the united | states | and all other english speaking |
running tradition in the united | states | and canada for example the |
power brokers are the united | states | and china i believe that |
colin campbell s1m 1815 united | states | and kyoto protocol lodged on |
slovakia australia israel japan united | states | argentina brazil colombia mexico and |
income as do the united | states | australia new zealand and canada |
of pay in the united | states | different states pay different rates |
mass media in the united | states | do not produce convergence in |
the schools in the united | states | f641: mmhm yes absolutely no |
james sabzali in the united | states | for the violation of washington |
embargo enforced by the united | states | government supported by mr lloyd |
united kingdom and the united | states | i understand that beta interferon |
the president of the united | states | if he was i would |
canada australia or the united | states | it would be easy for |
to live in the united | states | like most exiles i kept |
action to prevent the united | states | navy from using the cape |
2234 terrorist attacks in united | states | of america and response of |
emptive action by the united | states | of america and the united |
the president of the united | states | of america at the white |
already banned in the united | states | of america further notes the |
harper r s1m 3922 united | states | of america government ban on |
gil paterson s1m 3922 united | states | of america government ban on |
another reason why the united | states | of america s illegal economic |
academic links with the united | states | of america s1o 4702 11 |
be pursued in the united | states | of america s1w 22111 richard |
the eu and the united | states | of america s1w 6012 mary |
dictatorship and unlike the united | states | of america we hadn t |
is used in the united | states | of america where there is |
a drive towards a united | states | of europe of course that |
in the united states different | states | pay different rates there is |
brain disorders in the united | states | s1w 3631 shona robison to |
the same in the united | states | s1w 3632 shona robison to |
rodale institute in the united | states | shows one encouraging development which |
countries such as the united | states | that have been able to |
years ago in the united | states | the republican and democrat parties |
road taken by the united | states | the uk at present and |
the example of the united | states | where people work as long |
ll be happy in the | states | pop ower fae america whar |
thank you the policy memorandum | states | that the bill will ensure |
adequate funding the policy memorandum | states | that the current system for |
2002 the executive s memorandum | states | that their current priorities are |
s memorandum on the bill | states | the bill itself is concerned |
ball rolling the policy memorandum | states | the core objective of the |
2 of the policy memorandum | states | the long term aim of |
matters yet the executive memorandum | states | the policy of both the |
s memorandum on the bill | states | the purpose of this bill |
scotland bill s policy memorandum | states | whilst acknowledging the importance of |
engage directly with other eu | states | and norway to achieve this |
budget lines in various eu | states | as you probably heard at |
recent european commission report 2003 | states | that 15 of the eu |
the arrogance of the big | states | will cause the eu to |
order to ratify the treaty | states | are required to be able |
i understand that until 60 | states | have ratified the treaty the |
security council at present 29 | states | have ratified the treaty the |
concerned the treaty deals with | states | on the international plain the |
one of the first 60 | states | to ratify the treaty the |
but only four european union | states | have given that recognition denmark |
print publications imported from other | states | in the european union s1w |
europe there will be new | states | in the european union some |
facing a larger europe the | states | that are joining the union |
european union countries and applicant | states | which is to be held |
taken out the next paragraph | states | before taking any action as |
final paragraph on page 4 | states | failure to comply with or |
go from here paragraph 8 | states | in anticipation of the commission |
points again the first paragraph | states | members of the scottish parliament |
to ireland paragraph 4 12 | states | that the foreign and commonwealth |
paragraph three of your submission | states | the government admits that a |
introductory paragraph des mcnulty it | states | these occasions should be limited |
an expanding europe of accession | states | from what perspective is the |
a europe of the nation | states | i make those comments because |
especially to areas in accession | states | in eastern and central europe |
in some of the emergent | states | of eastern and central europe |
lowest common denominator among the | states | of the council of europe |
languages which have covered 47 | states | whilst the council of europe |
which states the executive response | states | that sportscotland often negotiates alternative |
of the cover note which | states | the executive response states that |
prosecutions taking place in individual | states | a lot of time and |
procedures and evidence if individual | states | take proceedings differently from how |
1 of the standing orders | states | that the european committee must |
european level but within nation | states | the power to initiate legislation |
european hemicycle as the motion | states | there are close working links |
policy at help the aged | states | homes have to be closed |
the policy s action plan | states | specifically that the spcb will |
employment policy one executive document | states | that it does not usually |
trevor lodge s letter he | states | a report of lead in |
letter to me the letter | states | although the rules for the |
than sitting days his letter | states | i quite agree at first |
throughout the country the letter | states | it is plain from the |
ross finnie s letter it | states | it took snh some time |
the first minister the letter | states | on behalf of cosla i |
on going the letter also | states | the executive does not produce |
languages by governments of the | states | in which they are spoken |
in its paper the board | states | no minority languages in the |
and english languages this section | states | that the purpose of the |
standard languages of the centralised | states | to which they now belonged |
be represented small and developing | states | are represented on the judiciary |
from small or non aligned | states | indeed it was an initiative |
and initiatives the report also | states | that a very small number |
age of the small semitic | states | when men and their gods |
is quite possible that small | states | will be represented small and |
loose language for example it | states | that the court must look |
sport society bfss for example | states | unlike those dogs which pursue |
translated rule 15 6 3 | states | that the petitioner shall be |
than one council that correspondence | states | that the councils have throughout |
on whether and how other | states | comply with the directive mr |
been much criticised by other | states | it has been driven by |
ties with the other arab | states | so instability in egypt looks |
bfss on the other hand | states | that a fox is nearly |
account further notes that other | states | that fish scottish waters or |
the schedule to the bill | states | that other statutory functions and |
with other regions sub national | states | the presiding officers of the |
of social security material it | states | most significantly benefit receipt is |
social justice committee s report | states | on page 13 the committee |
in scotland as mcclure also | states | it cannot be realistically envisaged |
clients professional lobbyists it also | states | it is difficult to give |
etc scotland regulations 1981 which | states | proposals must also be submitted |
scottish parliament the message also | states | that the national assembly looks |
scottish parliament the message also | states | that the tynwald looks forward |
play however the guideline also | states | that they should be part |
a concern your submission also | states | we believe that the bill |
the voluntary sector the report | states | clearly that involvement in the |
of the committee s report | states | efforts should be concentrated on |
o a multilingual world report | states | it will help students theretil |
of a multilingual world report | states | that it will help students |
extreme concern that the report | states | that no drugs strategy is |
italian and japanese the report | states | that the continuing vitality of |
rail and that the report | states | that the existing road route |
the committee s report which | states | the evidence that poindings and |
prosecution karen whitefield your report | states | the guidance makes brief acknowledgement |
italian an japanese the report | states | the ongaun virr o oor |
the section on lobbying which | states | a distinction can be made |
about rule 43 8 which | states | any party opposing such an |
child which monitors how well | states | are meeting obligations toward the |
of the explanatory notes which | states | at no time during the |
is the extent to which | states | have discretion in the way |
university hospitals nhs trust which | states | i share your concerns over |
independent what considerations will motivate | states | in deciding precisely which judges |
can envisage without difficulty some | states | in the world about which |
acquire a nonchalent expression which | states | quite clearly as the owner |
11 subsection 2 of which | states | quite clearly the scottish ministers |
answer to s1w 32797 which | states | that by long standing convention |
answer to s1w 32400 which | states | that legal advice was obtained |
covert human intelligence sources which | states | that members of the public |
on human rights echr which | states | that no person shall be |
the party s website which | states | that please note that four |
guidance on nursery education which | states | that pre school centres are |
attention to the wording which | states | that the court would look |
preamble of the decision which | states | that the objective set for |
with section 60 10 which | states | that the proceedings can be |
definition in section 7 which | states | that to hunt includes to |
agree with section 113 which | states | the biggest area for improvement |
from 12th february 1924 which | states | the legacy from the estate |
which they obtain from the | states | they cannot afford it and |
official reporters own internal guidance | states | the following the most important |
the application for bail i | states | reasons why it should be |
the rights of the child | states | that children should be free |
s strategy the strategy document | states | that pharmacists should encourage adherence |
approval the welsh language board | states | that the schemes should be |
building in section 51 it | states | that the term should be |
should do is important it | states | that the uk should intensify |
time to speak up document | states | a national programme has not |
the section rationale the guidelines | states | a bairn s earliest leid |
same theme section 1 5 | states | a person who owns or |
go through section 1 3 | states | an owner or occupier of |
new section that it proposes | states | subsections 3 to 8 of |
bill section 1 2 clearly | states | that an offence is only |
3 public bodies section 3 | states | that the bill will apply |
as it stands section 17 | states | that the chief surveillance commissioner |
scotland act 1996 that section | states | that the secretary of state |
those two groups and require | states | in selecting judges to take |
the right of independent nation | states | is prevailing over those of |
prevailing over those of devolved | states | that reinforces the argument that |
group on free nursing care | states | that those who refuse assessment |
in new zealand or da | states | an aa dat kinda places |
struggled to dream of the | states | eldorado new york but the |
subsection 1 of the bill | states | a person who is party |
bill s intention the bill | states | specifically the scottish ministers shall |
of part 2 the bill | states | that a person is subject |
the bill but amendment 27 | states | that ministers will be responsible |
on page 2 his submission | states | the bill would make it |
stamp types of the russian | states | and their overprints and cancellations |
judicial office in their home | states | they are to be people |
on whether any of these | states | advocate such committees and if |
exercise of freedom of expression | states | the exercise of these freedoms |
possible practice note number 3 | states | practitioners are reminded that in |
planning and the historic environment | states | that 3 responsibility for the |
3 19 on page 29 | states | that the scottish executive has |
language and ethnicity when he | states | language together with culture religion |
2005 the welsh language board | states | that there is now a |
standard language o the centrist | states | they belangit the naiture o |
standard language o the centrist | states | they belangit the naiture o |
league against cruel sports lacs | states | after moving off from the |
way address her question it | states | apart from additional capacity negotiated |
got the idea from the | states | as he thought that icecream |
just coming in from the | states | at that si- time but |
tea from local authorities it | states | in addition to compliance with |
from scottish ministers subsection 4 | states | that in considering whether or |
taken from the annual review | states | that the executive is giving |
in any event the statute | states | that it is only where |
tobacco workers alliance the agenda | states | that there is only one |
of the year and it | states | in its leaflet that because |
review of planning the executive | states | in its response that it |
19 highlands and islands enterprise | states | its tourism priorities as being |
in its paper the board | states | nae minority leids in the |
tippie that cam fae e | states | another of the fencing tools |
sometimes dramatisations are showing poetic | states | erm that exist and don |
questions you state that 139 | states | have signed and 29 have |
medical officer for scotland who | states | i hope that local health |
requiring two separate and independent | states | is further concerned that under |
on leids in the uk | states | it has been jaloused that |
oh okay [inaudible] in the | states | m964: yes f965: and that |
aware that our strategic plan | states | our commitment to prioritising the |
briquettes given that the legislation | states | specifically where the company can |
dcms and the scottish executive | states | that 12 world heritage sites |
amendments rule 9 10 5 | states | that an amendment is inadmissible |
life that many of the | states | that are already in the |
that there are not many | states | that are in the anomalous |
jarvie of seniorline in scotland | states | that calls to seniorline reflect |
to the allotment service it | states | that capital spend is on |
to question 14 where he | states | that guidelines might be developed |
expert support is available to | states | that have ratified the convention |
1a of standing orders now | states | that if a petition is |
jim wallace s office simply | states | that it is felt that |
with partner schools although it | states | that it is keen for |
skilled workforce scottish business consistently | states | that it needs a more |
17th may 1874 the moderator | states | that on the 14th inst |
by subsection 6 b this | states | that regulations made under subsection |
research note of 2 march | states | that shortly after his appointment |
the legal systems of the | states | that signed the statute in |
usual charm free mood he | states | that some of the masts |
the minister as you say | states | that the executive has not |
taen fae the annual review | states | that the executive is giein |
government making it work together | states | that the executive will consult |
hugh dignon the rome statute | states | that the icc can take |
has given an answer that | states | that the information sought in |
ingram the second bullet point | states | that the members interests order |
mcnulty the third bullet point | states | that the members interests order |
suggested in the additional paper | states | that the notification may at |
trying to do the motion | states | that the parliament believes that |
the rural affairs committee1 this | states | that the parliament recognises and |
this phase the laeken declaration | states | that the proceedings of the |
executive draft budget 2003 04 | states | that the target is to |
issued in may 1998 it | states | that the tolerable standard has |
racial equality in scotland ceres | states | that there has been a |
2005 the welsh leid board | states | that there noo in wales |
that amendment 27 would insert | states | that there shall be no |
among the 100 or so | states | that took part in the |
out an application form that | states | we understand that you are |
law bills includes sections that | states | whan they will come intil |
the assumption that the 60 | states | will have ratified by about |
are not very many such | states | however the rome statute is |
planning guideline 19 the executive | states | further reassurance may be taken |
120 of the rome statute | states | no reservations may be made |
1 of the standing orders | states | a committee shall meet to |
10 11 of standing orders | states | an amendment at any stage |
portugal east to the baltic | states | and of course south to |
of all the mid east | states | and president mubarak seems set |
handstamps stamps of the various | states | and stamps overprinted and used |
i found funny in the | states | cause i sort of took |
the withdrawal or acceptance of | states | flies in the face of |
and method of implementation to | states | i will develop briefly michael |
on the question of consultation | states | in accordance with the eia |
the economies of the accession | states | in january 2003 the commission |
of the names of the | states | let us be careful kontuz |
brats and brawlers and mind | states | of no fixed abode leftovers |
first comprehensive account of galloway | states | of old innermessan was the |
in negotiating the statute the | states | put a lot of effort |
page 27 of the paper | states | some sectors particularly information technology |
of the judiciary article 40 | states | the judges shall be independent |
1 to the 1997 act | states | this part of this act |
the scotland act 1998 it | states | we are not aware of |
on human rights article 8 | states | 1 everyone has the right |
an minoritie leids at memmer | states | allous as eligible asks the |
absolutely not taught in the | states | because it s in the |
my sister lives in the | states | but it s great visiting |
in hunting as the lacs | states | canids wolves jackals dogs etc |
call it tag in the | states | f965: erm if you hit |
o jam looks roon an | states | i m ready for the |
by the regions not the | states | if they are not it |
come otherwise more than 100 | states | in the world would feel |
onybody nae born in the | states | is an ill daein terrorist |
as dr simpson s amendment | states | is to consider the practicalities |
up real sheepish like an | states | it s the pancakes jonsar |
to the mennonites in 24 | states | mexico and canada pennsylvania has |
i m over in the | states | now four years graduate school |
by the uk the paper | states | some sectors particularly information technology |
scottish executive dated 1 february | states | the 2001 census the first |
retention in nursing and midwifery | states | the career journey for nurses |
a formal complaint his response | states | the complaints made to the |
for health and community care | states | the executive s health department |
issue is the first 60 | states | to ratify whether the us |
funds 5 the 22 nation | states | were as follows austria belgium |
s like places in the | states | where either there s f965: |
year providing the opportunity for | states | with a direct interest in |
an yersel aa roon the | states | ye ll hae saved ma |
governments have to decide as | states | whether to draw down there |
in his submission matthew fitt | states | there are few ways in |
50 as professor richard johnstone | states | in his submission there is |
50 as professor richard johnstone | states | in his submission there no |
in his submission matthew fitt | states | there gey few weys scots |
le gusta la musica maria | states | any well felt music be |
there is discretion for signatory | states | to choose how they ratify |
to convene something like 120 | states | and get agreement it took |
both oral and post oral | states | for buchan mrs brown s |
main principles and objectives underlying | states | policies legislation and practice and |
policies legislation an practice o | states | an is regairdit as providin |
even a mob when davidson | states | his eye s enchanted ray |
hill it s like this | states | jonsar eck yon kirk came |