surveillance
See this word as a collocate cloud
notification of authorisations for intrusive | surveillance | amendment 11 moved mr jim |
section 6 authorisation of intrusive | surveillance | amendments 35 and 36 moved |
intrusive surveillance rather than directed | surveillance | angus mackay i recalled the |
entitle you to conduct intrusive | surveillance | as you do not believe |
specific definition relating to intrusive | surveillance | but it may be possible |
be able to use intrusive | surveillance | by applying to the chief |
the authorisation was for intrusive | surveillance | directed surveillance or the use |
is rightly classed as intrusive | surveillance | however an individual s expectation |
justify an authorisation for intrusive | surveillance | irrespective of where the surveillance |
what constitutes intrusive or directed | surveillance | is it where the surveillance |
justify the use of intrusive | surveillance | on the other hand seven |
for an order for intrusive | surveillance | one would also have to |
the use of covert intrusive | surveillance | or sources i move amendment |
was for intrusive surveillance directed | surveillance | or the use of a |
for the more onerous intrusive | surveillance | rather than directed surveillance angus |
rights issues other than intrusive | surveillance | s1w 6035 roseanna cunningham to |
to speak if the intrusive | surveillance | target is expected to be |
sufficiently serious to warrant intrusive | surveillance | the bill and the codes |
as directed rather than intrusive | surveillance | the bill recognises that there |
as directed rather than intrusive | surveillance | the nub of the issue |
arises no authorisation for intrusive | surveillance | which is about the highest |
between the three categories intrusive | surveillance | which is the most intrusive |
notifications of authorisations for intrusive | surveillance | will be set out in |
area in which that intrusive | surveillance | will take place it is |
have wrongly been put under | surveillance | and who should never have |
has been wrongly placed under | surveillance | but who has no connection |
people are wrongly put under | surveillance | i do not say that |
i said that where a | surveillance | operation has been wrongly carried |
people who were wrongly under | surveillance | some time ago during industrial |
has wrongly been put under | surveillance | that person should not be |
someone has been put under | surveillance | wrongly for whatever reason they |
who has been placed under | surveillance | wrongly must be destroyed any |
the surveillance commissioners the chief | surveillance | commissioner has assured us that |
3 to 8 of section | surveillance | commissioners above apply and i |
authorities those authorities include the | surveillance | commissioners although we believe that |
12 appeals against decisions by | surveillance | commissioners amendments 55 and 56 |
information to be provided to | surveillance | commissioners amendments 57 and 58 |
on the required number of | surveillance | commissioners and chief surveillance commissioners |
on the numbers of chief | surveillance | commissioners and surveillance commissioners i |
appear to apply to assistant | surveillance | commissioners does that imply that |
oversight being provided by the | surveillance | commissioners established by the 1997 |
of chief surveillance commissioners and | surveillance | commissioners i accept or at |
of surveillance commissioners and chief | surveillance | commissioners i am sure that |
will the work of the | surveillance | commissioners in scotland fit in |
be in the number of | surveillance | commissioners once the scottish commissioners |
the given number of chief | surveillance | commissioners or surveillance commissioners that |
will be issued to chief | surveillance | commissioners or whether guidance on |
of chief surveillance commissioners or | surveillance | commissioners that will not require |
have scottish judges as scottish | surveillance | commissioners the balance has to |
the bill will be the | surveillance | commissioners the chief surveillance commissioner |
is consistency in what chief | surveillance | commissioners think is appropriate for |
must be provided to the | surveillance | commissioners to enable them to |
amendment 28 deals with assistant | surveillance | commissioners towards the end of |
gave in relation to the | surveillance | commissioners whether it is competent |
of chief ordinary and assistant | surveillance | commissioners who will all have |
constable of the area directed | surveillance | and the conduct and use |
crime squad to authorise directed | surveillance | and the conduct and use |
assent while authorisations for directed | surveillance | and the use of covert |
public authority to have directed | surveillance | authorisation as well i think |
for an order for directed | surveillance | can the minister enlighten me |
that they carry out directed | surveillance | or actions that is why |
for the authorisation of directed | surveillance | or covert human intelligence sources |
bodies that can authorise directed | surveillance | or the use of human |
section 3 authorisation of directed | surveillance | the deputy presiding officer we |
be required to mount directed | surveillance | the difficulty would lie in |
the difficulty is that directed | surveillance | would be involved if i |
codes of practice on covert | surveillance | and covert human intelligence sources |
regulation of investigatory powers covert | surveillance | code of practice scotland order |
regulation of investigatory powers covert | surveillance | code of practice scotland order |
regulation of investigatory powers covert | surveillance | code of practice scotland order |
obtain authority to approve covert | surveillance | covert activities are highly expensive |
person authorised to carry out | surveillance | ii any covert human intelligence |
that far from increasing covert | surveillance | operations the bill will restrict |
bill attempts to bring covert | surveillance | out of the shadowy world |
that the use of covert | surveillance | techniques is compatible with the |
grounds for authorisation of direct | surveillance | i do not believe that |
to cancel an authorisation for | surveillance | if he or she believes |
authorisation of urgent cross border | surveillance | operations by overseas officers in |
also authorisation of cross border | surveillance | required by article 40 of |
to a few subjects of | surveillance | when the authorisation had come |
the amendment every authorisation for | surveillance | would need to be reviewed |
can authorise the use of | surveillance | or human sources under the |
the authorities can authorise a | surveillance | order if they perceive there |
power for ministers to authorise | surveillance | which was an important and |
surveillance is it where the | surveillance | device is located or where |
surveillance irrespective of where the | surveillance | device itself is located i |
as opposed to where the | surveillance | devices are located under the |
or where the person under | surveillance | is located it seems common |
are located under the bill | surveillance | that is targeted on someone |
the decision of a chief | surveillance | commissioner but cannot do so |
mr gorrie accepts that the | surveillance | commissioner has to make an |
himself or herself to the | surveillance | commissioner i believe that this |
any decision of a chief | surveillance | commissioner i would like the |
on the part of the | surveillance | commissioner nor to a commissioner |
makes sense for the chief | surveillance | commissioner s report on the |
17 states that the chief | surveillance | commissioner shall give information to |
would state that the chief | surveillance | commissioner shall provide such information |
section 17 functions of chief | surveillance | commissioner the deputy presiding officer |
could be given to the | surveillance | commissioner there is any number |
situation in which one chief | surveillance | commissioner thought that certain information |
the removal of a chief | surveillance | commissioner to be approved by |
the two acts the chief | surveillance | commissioner under the 1997 act |
technical it is the chief | surveillance | commissioner who decides what is |
take that action is the | surveillance | commissioner who should act in |
fulcrum would have been the | surveillance | commissioner who should have undertaken |
relation to how the chief | surveillance | commissioner will give information to |
3 provides that the chief | surveillance | commissioner will make an annual |
authority to provide an ordinary | surveillance | commissioner with any information that |
year at present the chief | surveillance | commissioner writes his report on |
a former surveillance subject that | surveillance | has ended would not be |
been under surveillance that such | surveillance | has happened although i will |
recommendation to inform a former | surveillance | subject that surveillance has ended |
using sophisticated criminal methods often | surveillance | techniques and the use of |
it it will ensure that | surveillance | techniques are used only for |
enforcement agencies when they use | surveillance | techniques do so in compliance |
framework for the use of | surveillance | techniques in scotland it will |
sundry who have been under | surveillance | that such surveillance has happened |
what has happened since police | surveillance | operations began and saying that |
important role in police operations | surveillance | operations have led to scottish |
it is appropriate to conduct | surveillance | operations he continued my point |
available on the level of | surveillance | operations in scotland s1f 1681 |
attaching to urgent cross border | surveillance | operations in the uk are |
for instance in effective police | surveillance | operations it is not difficult |
considered in every case where | surveillance | has been properly authorised and |
and b that the authorised | surveillance | is proportionate to what is |
case irrespective of whether the | surveillance | was properly authorised and carried |
case irrespective of whether the | surveillance | was properly authorised and carried |
have been the subjects of | surveillance | and if so how christine |
have been the subjects of | surveillance | if a criminal in that |
makes it mandatory to inform | surveillance | subjects perhaps members think that |
in my amendment to notify | surveillance | subjects would be triggered only |
good reasons most subjects of | surveillance | will not be aware that |
society generally the use of | surveillance | or human sources is not |
member state to conduct unaccompanied | surveillance | in another member state for |
to carry out a particular | surveillance | exercise that said the conservatives |
other countries to carry out | surveillance | in the united kingdom for |
bodies that can carry out | surveillance | it is likely therefore that |
the police to carry out | surveillance | on members of the public |
able to carry out the | surveillance | that would be necessary for |
the ability to carry out | surveillance | the bill achieves that to |
respect to urgent cross border | surveillance | by the police where serious |
substantive issues about cross border | surveillance | which the uk government will |
why they had been under | surveillance | an individual would certainly want |
who had been put under | surveillance | and been found to be |
somebody who had been under | surveillance | and did not know about |
that they have been under | surveillance | and members will see that |
if somebody had been under | surveillance | and no harm or prejudice |
whether they have been under | surveillance | and the situation is reviewed |
have been the subject of | surveillance | as provided for under the |
that they have been under | surveillance | because there was no reason |
people who have been under | surveillance | by the state it is |
person who has been under | surveillance | can use that tribunal to |
people will be put under | surveillance | for the wrong reasons but |
not have been put under | surveillance | gordon went on to say |
people who have been under | surveillance | have a right to be |
real criminality that is under | surveillance | he also intriguingly asked what |
that they have been under | surveillance | he must be fully informed |
that they had been under | surveillance | i do not know how |
whether they have been under | surveillance | improperly the appropriate structure would |
or she has been under | surveillance | in summing up can the |
never have been put under | surveillance | in the first place to |
were under some form of | surveillance | in their youth although it |
or she had been under | surveillance | provided of course that there |
of bse under the bse | surveillance | scheme they are fallen stock |
person who had been under | surveillance | should be told a very |
if they have been under | surveillance | so i assume that the |
that they had been under | surveillance | that leads me to believe |
them that they were under | surveillance | that might do an individual |
that they had been under | surveillance | that raises the question whether |
and how they were under | surveillance | the state is the servant |
be told what kind of | surveillance | they were under i still |
that miners leaders were under | surveillance | through telephone tapping even well |
that they have been under | surveillance | we will ensure that that |
the person who is under | surveillance | will not be aware of |
cock up occurred during a | surveillance | operation and a person with |
potential that although a foreign | surveillance | operation might start south of |
been the subject of a | surveillance | operation the system is open |
mean the circumstances in which | surveillance | is granted for person a |
is no further reason for | surveillance | of a particular person that |
that street for that reason | surveillance | targeted on a person who |
that there has not been | surveillance | the person will never know |
would be the issue for | surveillance | if the police thought that |
a legal framework for police | surveillance | to attempt to achieve echr |
our own authorities use of | surveillance | in the uk without giving |
would be triggered only when | surveillance | has been quashed ceased or |
of the process of undertaking | surveillance | i have been on a |
have been subjected unfairly to | surveillance | i realise that the important |
had been the subject of | surveillance | might try to take matters |
have been the subject of | surveillance | official report justice and home |
been the subject of unwarranted | surveillance | the right of appeal to |
greater scope to undertake costly | surveillance | we have been assured by |
information bill this information on | surveillance | is not going to be |
who had a suspicion that | surveillance | had taken place although the |
to create an environment where | surveillance | is subject to statutory regulation |
25 is to provide that | surveillance | that involves a device or |
is designed to provide that | surveillance | that involves a device or |
which related to drug trafficking | surveillance | continues to play an important |
important dennis canavan talked about | surveillance | situations that people should now |
particularly in respect of allowing | surveillance | of criminals in order to |
circumstances ever arose when the | surveillance | order is no longer applicable |
pointed to the categories for | surveillance | such as public order and |
were to be determined such | surveillance | requires trained operatives who are |
up my mind whether if | surveillance | has taken place but there |
include the situation in which | surveillance | has uncovered evidence of wrong |
agreed to section 2 lawful | surveillance | etc phil gallie amendment 30 |
particularly when it deals with | surveillance | however as the deputy first |
even if the instance of | surveillance | over however long a period |
to build in protection for | surveillance | systems however i still think |
that can be changed such | surveillance | is not criminal and is |
he was concerned about such | surveillance | on civil liberties grounds but |
be subjected to unjustified official | surveillance | we have to accept that |
agents would run up to | surveillance | targets to show them the |
foresee that notifying people of | surveillance | would be more likely to |
of doors the type of | surveillance | would change i am not |
not confirm to someone that | surveillance | had taken or was taking |
tribunal to find out about | surveillance | a suspicion will not clear |
record on the issue of | surveillance | and echr compatibility members should |
the legislation applies to the | surveillance | world i am not sure |
difficulty in my view external | surveillance | is required if louse levels |
principle to cases of wrong | surveillance | becoming public i also quote |
of individuals involved in the | surveillance | activities basically it is a |
legislate and to ensure that | surveillance | is properly governed and controlled |
of the way in which | surveillance | is undertaken i regret that |
disclose the fact of that | surveillance | unless the authorising officer perceives |
disclose the fact of that | surveillance | unless the authorising officer perceives |
about the highest category of | surveillance | and includes bugging devices in |
between the need to undertake | surveillance | and the protection of individuals |
the problems raised by the | surveillance | of known felons whose associates |
to make authorisations for direct | surveillance | on a range of issues |
the wholly innocent party about | surveillance | subsection 4 builds in a |
a requirement to disclose the | surveillance | to the suspect i appreciate |
nor monitored by anyman s | surveillance | it may sit beside you |
by undertaking say a technical | surveillance | on a fox s lair |
in the stage 1 debate | surveillance | last year played a key |
and improve animal health and | surveillance | services revitalising fishing scotland s |
asked as political movements shifted | surveillance | data was sifted leaders loaded |